More Ruhe/Paññobhāsa Interview Videos

The Nikaya Dhamma Society denounces YouTube’s decision to ban Brian Ruhe’s YouTube channel. This ban was no doubt in response to Ruhe’s nationalist views. We appreciate his many great video interviews with Ven. Pannobhasa. These videos, fortunately, can still be watched on his BitChute channel, and they continue making new videos on a regular basis! YouTube’s efforts to stifle and suppress dissident speech will ultimately fail, as more and more content creators flee to BitChute in order to continue their work. Brian and Ven. Pannobhasa discuss it here. You can read more about what happened to Brian Ruhe’s channel here:

– Sudhamma

Reposted from:

More Ruhe/Paññobhāsa Interview Videos

I have continued to be interviewed by Herr Brian Ruhe for his video channel once per week, with multiple segments posted from each interview. I would have said his YouTube channel, but a few weeks ago the YouTube thought police purged almost all of his content from the site, including our interviews. This was probably not because of any of the content of our discussions (though some of it could be politically incorrect enough to elicit a few red flags), but more because of his alt-right politics, rampant rejection of official narratives, etc. But anyhow, his stuff is still on Bitchute, to which site I am gradually transitioning, since YouTube appears to be moving towards 1984 mode with regard to unpersoning content creators guilty of non-leftist wrongthink. Even so, I have posted a few of these videos, thus far, on my old YouTube channel, which channel I had pretty much ignored for several years.

I don’t edit, produce, or name these videos, except for the titles to the videos I post onto my own YouTube channel; and if I did provide the thumbnails etc. I might indulge in a bit more subtlety at times, but never mind. For the most part I stand by all of this, even though when talking off the cuff I occasionally misspeak, or omit to say something important, and may occasionally get a little too “edgy” in my social critiques to suit even nonconformist western Buddhists. But that’s all OK too. I consider much of the stuff below to be important, and potentially even helpful. I’m seriously considering getting a Styxhexenhammer mug and a spoon for future videos.

Fifth Series (recorded June 1)

Social Justice vs. Actual Dharma, or in other words, leftist sentiment vs. Buddhist ethics (39:50)

Attitude Toward Muslims in Buddhist Burma (30:53)

On the Taungpulu Forest Tradition of Burma, and on cave-dwelling and dhutanga ascetic practices in general (28:13)

On “ascension” and other alleged mass shifts of consciousness, and also the idea of group karma (27:27)

On the Buddhist attitude towards Free Will (39:23)

Sixth Series (recorded June 7)

On the recent YouTube Purge, on the “Establishment’s” Control of the Narrative, and on the Cultural Civil Cold War Currently Raging in the West (with a little shilling for and President Donald Trump) (41:29)

On Reverse Logic and the Ordination of Theravada Buddhist Nuns (the biggest political correctness controversy in Theravada today) (39:35)

Seventh Series (recorded June 14)

Theravada and the early origins of Mahayana (in which I almost completely forget to talk about the Bodhisattva concept) (1:13:33)

On History, Propaganda, and Control of the Narrative (including Brian’s theories on how modern archeology is wrong, and that white people lived on this planet for possibly millions of years—this was kind of a frustrating experience for me) (44:04)

On Alt-Buddhism, and what a non-“progressive” western Buddhism could or should be like (51:25)

Extra Added Bonus

On “The Time I Was Attacked by Ogres,” with Otto Excelsior

Also, a re-posting to YouTube of the video on Why Western Buddhists Usually Fail

Abortion is Murder according to Buddha

This article is from: It is re-blogged here in its entirety.

Abortion is Murder according to Buddha

In the time of Buddha, abortion is the same as murder by common sense. But today, many people would argue that abortion is not murder, especially if performed early enough. In this post, I will explain what Buddha said about abortion.


Common Sense

If one looks deeply enough in Tripitaka, there is nothing that says “abortion is murder” explicitly. That’s because it was a common fact that needs no clarification. Saying abortion is murder back then is similar to saying that a smartphone needs electricity in 2019.

In order to prove that abortion is murder, here are instances when Buddha talked about abortion.

Abortion in Monastic Code

In the monastic code, there are four offenses (known as pārājika) that must never be done. Once committed, a monk is expelled and is no longer a monk. This is the most severe punishment a monk can get. One of these offenses is committing murder or intentionally killing a human being.

Should any bhikkhu intentionally deprive a human being of life, or search for an assassin for him, or praise the advantages of death, or incite him to die (saying,): “My good man, what use is this evil, miserable life to you? Death would be better for you than life,” or with such an idea in mind, such a purpose in mind, should in various ways praise the advantages of death or incite him to die, he also is defeated and no longer in affiliation.

Bhikkhu Patimokkha

Buddha was very specific about what is murder and what is not. Here are some excerpts regarding abortion.

At one time, a pregnant woman said to a monk who is close to her family,

“May venerable sir suggest medicine for abortion.”

The monk said, “Sister, with such medicine, you may abort.”

The woman then got an abortion. With disdain, the monk wondered if he committed a parajika offense. He asked Buddha.

Buddha said, “Monk, you have committed a parajika offense.”


At one time, a pregnant woman said to a monk who is close to her family,

“May venerable sir suggest medicine for abortion. “

The monk said, “Sister, you should make the womb hot”.

The woman then made the womb hot and the pregnancy was aborted. With disdain, the monk wondered if he committed a parajika offense. He asked Buddha.

Buddha said, “Monk, you have committed a parajika offense.”


At one time, an infertile woman said to a monk who is close to her family,

“May venerable sir suggest medicine for fertility.”

The monk said, “Very well sister,” and gave her the medicine.

The woman died as a result. With disdain, the monk wondered if he committed a parajika offense. He asked Buddha.

Buddha said, “Monk, you have not committed a parajika offense. You committed a dukkata offense”

Source in Thai: พระวินัยปิฎก มหาวิภังค์ เล่ม ๑ ภาค ๒ – หน้าที่ 303.

To put it simply, if a monk helps a woman get an abortion, he commits a pārājika offense – the same offense as intentionally killing a person. By this evidence, abortion is murder.

Additionally, on the last case presented above, a monk gave fertility medicine to a woman and she died because of his action. Buddha said this is not a pārājika offense because the monk had no intention to kill anyone with his action. However, the monk still committed a minor (dukkaṭa) offense.

Life Begins at Conception

Still, one could argue that the fetus is not a person. Killing a fetus is not murder. To counter this argument, I will show more pieces of evidence from Tripitaka to prove that Buddha recognized a fetus as a human being from the start.

In the monastic code again, Buddha created a rule specifically about killing animals.

Should any bhikkhu intentionally deprive an animal of life, it is to be confessed.

Bhikkhu Patimokkha

As stated, the offense for intentionally killing an animal is much less severe than killing a person. Killing an animal only requires the monk to confess his wrongdoing. By this difference in severity, Buddha acknowledged that killing a person is more severe than killing an animal. Since Buddha made assisting in abortion a pārājika offense, rather than a minor offense like killing an animal, logic says that human life begins at conception. Abortion, at any stage, is murder.

To further reinforce this argument, here are additional references.

Some are born in the human womb,
evildoers in hell,
those on the good course go to heaven,
while those without effluent: totally unbound.

Dhammapada 126

If a human being is born in the human womb, then life begins at conception inside the womb.

Over and over, the fool goes to the womb.
Over and over, he’s born and he dies

Udaya Sutta

Again, “fool goes to the womb” means a being is born in the womb, not outside of it.

Consciousness before Conception

In one sermon, Buddha mentioned consciousness in a mother’s womb.

From consciousness as a requisite condition comes name-and-form.’ Thus it has been said. And this is the way to understand how from consciousness as a requisite condition comes name-and-form. If consciousness were not to descend into the mother’s womb, would name-and-form take shape in the womb?

Maha-nidana Sutta

This sermon is difficult to understand for people who do not study Buddhism. Basically, the sermon is about the cause and effect of life in rich detail. This part says that in order for a being to come into a womb, there must be a consciousness first. Consciousness can be any living being. If a consciousness is in a human womb, the consciousness is a human being from the start.

“No Uterus, No Opinion”

By the same logic stating that women should get to choose what they do with their body, the human being inside the womb should get to choose too. Since that human being is too young to choose, women should not have the right to make a life or death decision for that being. If a being has to choose, it will choose to live. That is the basic instinct of all living beings, especially the young ones.

Hard the winning of a human birth.
Hard the life of mortals.
Hard the chance to hear the true Dhamma.
Hard the arising of Awakened Ones.

Dhammapada 182

A human birth is very difficult to obtain but it is rewarding. That is because only human can learn Buddha’s teaching (Dhamma) better than any beings. Women who get abortion steal the human birth from their child.

Women should respect the rights of the human beings inside their womb to live.

Karmic Consequences from Abortion

If Buddha saw no harm in abortion, he would have not mentioned it. However, there is indeed a great karmic result in hell.

Abortion-mongers ’scape not thy dread stream, Vetarani.

Silk-cotton trees with thorns foot long of iron wrought, ’tis said,
On either bank, Vetarani, o’erhang thy gloomy bed.

All clothed in flame, one mass of fire, they stand against the sky,
And all ablaze with brilliant light tower a full league on high.

Samkicca Jataka

Here is my own modern English translation from the Thai Tripitaka which contain slightly different details.

Women who aborted their children step down a jagged path to a river in hell. The path is difficult to walk with sharp edges like a knife. Then, they fall into Vetarani River. There are several trees with sharp metallic spikes sixteen inches long. Their branches cover the Vetarani River on both sides, making it hard to traverse for the hellish beings (the women) who are sixteen kilometers tall. These beings are on fire constantly on their own, like a bonfire from afar.

Source in Thai: Samkicca Jataka

Of course most people think there is no hell in Buddhism. On the other hand, most people do not believe in heaven and hell at all. Take it for what is worth. Buddha described several hell realms with great details. The one described here is specifically for abortion.


As the evidence from Tripitaka shows, Buddha saw abortion and murder as the same thing. Buddha taught that life begins when consciousness enters a womb. He made no distinction if abortion is early enough or too late for it to be murder. Finally, Buddha said that the karmic consequence of abortion is reincarnation in hell.

May all beings appreciate all human lives.


I had a thought on abortion recently, when debating those who say it is acceptable. I now ask them, would it have been ok if your mother had an abortion, and had aborted you? Would you say it would have been fine if you were aborted, painfully, your skull stabbed with scissors and your brain sucked out with a vacum, your limbs ripped off your body, or if you were otherwise painfully killed in the womb for an abortion? I tell them, if you wouldn’t want to be aborted yourself, you are are a hypocrite to say its ok for others to die in this way.

Now some will say, yes it would have been ok if i was aborted. I don’t believe they are telling the truth. In fact, no one would want to be aborted themselves, and to die a painful death like this. Everyone born today who is alive, is a survivor of the abortion genocide. Most people who are pro-abortion are really not completely pro-abortion. They make an exception for themselves, being glad they were not aborted! I did get a few to admit this. So, unless they are willing to say, and they genuinely believe, that it would have been fine if their mother had them killed in the womb, they are just hypocrites.

It could be likened to a man who escaped an unjust sentence at a death camp. Everyone there is getting killed, but he says, I escaped, I am safe now, so I don’t care what you do to them! My own life is saved, so no one else matters. This is a fundamentally selfish, and an evil view. The fact that killing an unborn child has been raised to the status of a “human right,” shows how selfish society has become. Science does not support the view that a baby only becomes a person at the moment of birth. A baby also has unique DNA different from the mother, because the baby is a unique individual.

They say “pro-choice,” but this is a lie. The baby, as you pointed out, was not consulted or given a choice, and the baby is the one who is losing his or her life. But it is also a lie in another way. It is a lie because having sex creates babies. less than 1% of pregnancies in the US are a result of rape, that means that at least 99% of women who are pregnant, chose to get pregnant by having sex. Unless the woman was mentally retarded, she knew full well that having sex could create a baby, she cannot now demand a “choice,” she already had her choice, and she made it! Additionally, what makes her more important than the life of an unborn baby? Nothing, her life isn’t more important. Thank you again for the article. – Nikaya Dhamma Society

The Second Series of Ruhe/Paññobhāsa Interview Videos

Reposted from Venerable Paññobhāsa’s website, at the above link.

 Following are links to the most recent series of conversations between Brian Ruhe and me, conducted on 4 May ’19. This round of interviews places somewhat more emphasis on Brian’s interest in emphasizing common ground between Buddhism and National Socialism, and also in the identity of “reptilians” in Buddhism and in modern theories often associated with New Age. Plus I threw in some of my own favored emphasis on Ultimate Reality, and how we can’t understand it perceptually.

     Anyway, more interviews are in the works, and will be posted when they’re ready. Enjoy.

On past life regressions and the Buddhist idea of rebirth (37:44)
On western religion, ancient Indo-Europeans, the term “Ariya” in Buddhism, and the Buddhist attitude toward political violence (26:09)
On the nature of ultimate reality (20:02)
On George Washington, history, and the new left’s aversion for both (32:48)
On “reptilians” and the reliability of religious texts (31:48)
On Buddhist attitudes toward militarism, with some remarks on Germanic “Aryan” Spirituality (19:05)

Venerable Pannobhasa’s Debut, Buddhists’ Attitudes Towards Modern Western Thinking Video

This was previously a post of the above titled YouTube video. YouTube has since deleted Brian Ruhe’s channel. His videos with Ven. Pannobhasa can now be found here, on his BitChute channel:

As YouTube continues its war on freedom of thought and expression, more and more content creators will likely migrate to BitChute. please click on the above link, for many of Brian Ruhe’s videos with Ven. Pannobhasa. YouTube’s censorship policies will ultimately fail, as people go to other platforms, in search of freedom of speech.